When institutions fail, when laws are misused, or when executive actions violate fundamental freedoms, constitutional litigation becomes necessary. Our practice is rooted in the understanding that the right to approach the judiciary is itself an act of resistance—and a means of rebuilding the democratic values embedded in the Constitution.

We take on cases that raise urgent and complex constitutional questions—ranging from freedom of speech and privacy, to non-discrimination, equality before the law, and the right to life with dignity. These include challenges to arbitrary executive actions, unlawful detention, censorship, surveillance, exclusionary policies, and denial of basic services. We also litigate to hold public institutions accountable—whether through enforcing transparency, securing compliance with court orders, or demanding structural reforms.

Our litigation is both individual-centered and system-focused. On one hand, we represent clients whose personal rights have been violated—protesters facing police excesses, individuals denied welfare or identity documents, persons subjected to unlawful surveillance or blocked from accessing public spaces. On the other, we bring public interest cases that question institutional decay, majoritarian policy shifts, and state inaction in the face of constitutional mandates. Our commitment to constitutional litigation is grounded in both hope and history. We litigate in the spirit of those who fought for freedom, for civil liberties, and for the idea of a plural, inclusive democracy. Every article of the Constitution that we invoke in court is not just a provision—it is a political inheritance, a legal shield, and a roadmap for a more just society.

Through our work, we strive to keep that vision alive. In every filing, we assert not only what the Constitution prohibits—but what it makes possible.